|
#2
4th February 2017, 02:55 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: National Law University Delhi Previous Years Papers
As you are looking for previous year question papers of AILET Entrance Exam conducted by National Law University Delhi, so here are question papers: National Law University Delhi AILET Entrance Exam Question Paper Section Subjects Marks Questions A English 35 35 B General Knowledge 35 35 C Legal Aptitude 35 35 D Reasoning 35 35 E Mathematics 10 10 Total 150 150 Question Paper Directions (O- 1 - 6) : The questions in this section are based on the passage. The questions are to be answered on the basis of what is stated or implied in the pass;ge. For some of the questions, more than one ol the choices could conceivabiy answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the responsd that most ac;urately and completely answers the questions. The Constitution ofthe United States protects both property rights and freedom ol speech. At times these rights conflict. Resolution then requires a determination as to the ipe of property involved. lf the property is private and not open to the general public, the owner may absolutely deny the exercise of the right of free speech theraon. On the other hand, if public land is at issue, the First Amendment protections of expression are applicable. However, lhe exercise ol lree speech thereon is not absolute. Bather it |s necessarv lo determine the appropriateness of the Iorum. This requires that consideration be oiven io a number ol factors including: character and normaluse ofthe property, lhe extent t-o which it is open to the public, and the number and types of persons who frequent it. lf the forum is clearly public or clearly private, the resolution of the greater of rights is relatively straight forward, ln the area of quasi-public property, balancing these rights has produced a dilemma. This is the situation when a private owner permits the general public to use his property. When persons seekto use the land for passing out handbills orpicketing, how is a conflict between property rights and freedom of expression resolved ? In which one of the lollowing cases would the owner of the property probably be most free to restrict the lreedom of sDeech ? (a) an amusement park attended by live million people each year owned by a multinational company. (b) a small grocery shopping mall owned by a husband and wife (c) an enclosed shopping mall owned by a single woman (d) an eighl-unit residentialapartment building owned bya targe realesiate company A conflict between property rights and lreedom of speech might arise in all ot the following situations, EXCEPT (a) protestors carrying signs outside a cinema in an enclosed shopping mall (b) a disqruntled employee passing out leaflets in front of a hairdresseis salon (c) a religious order soliciting funds and converts in the swimming pool area ot a condominium (d) a candidate for mayor handing out flyers in lront of his opponent's headquarters According to the passage, an owner's freedom to deny freedom of speech on his property is determined by all ol the following EXCEPT (a) whether or not the land is open to the public (b) the nature of and the usual use ofthe property (c) the type of persons who frequents the land (d) the nature of character of the owner We can infer trom the passage that the author believes that shopping malls in America (a) should be in the service of the people who frequent them (b) have a right to prohibit distribution of advertising handbills (c) have a right to control any distributed materials (d) should permit any charitable solicitations National Law University Delhi AILET Entrance Exam Question Paper      |