Sample Paper of FMS Exam

Can you give me question paper for entrance exam pattern for admission in Faculty of Management Studies Delhi university soon >?/

[Arun Vats]

Here I am giving you question paper for entrance exam pattern for admission in Faculty of Management Studies Delhi university in a PDF file attached with it so you can get it easily.

The Indian Executives who do not travel by Economy Class are represented by the space numbered :
(1) 7 (2) 3
(3) 2 (4) None of the above

The Airline Company wishes to target Economy Class, non- Executive passengers for In-flight Duty Free Shopping.
Which area must it focus on?
(1) 6 and 5 (2) 6 and 2
(3) 1 and 2 (4) None of the above

Manish is Chitra’s son, Chitra and Simran are sisters, Dibleen is Simran’s mother. Sagar is the son of Dibleen. Which of the following statements is true?
(1) Sagar and Manish are cousins
(2) Sagar is the paternal uncle of Manish
(3) Simran is Manish’s grandmother
(4) Chitra and Sagar are siblings

Who stay in the same flat?
(1) Ambrish and Amit (2) Maim and Tarun
(3) Amit and Manu (4) Rohit and Tarun

The Chess player is a:
(1) Power engineer
(2) Mechanical Engineer
(3) Design engineer
(4) Quality inspector

English Comprehension(50 questions) Directions for Question Nos. 1 to 15:
Read the following passage-1 and answer the questions given at the end of the passage. The answers should be based either on the author's views or inferences drawn from the given passage.

Passage – 1 The fairness exercise, thus structured, is aimed at identifying appropriate principles that would determine the choice of just institutions needed for the basic structure of a society. Rawls identifies some very specific principles of justice (to be discussed presently), and makes the strong claim that these principles would be the unanimous choice that would emerge from the political conception of justice as fairness. He argues that since these principles would be chosen by all in the original position, with its primordial equality, they constitute the appropriate ‘political conception’ of justice, and that people growing up in a well-ordered society governed by these principles would have good reason to affirm a sense of justice based on them (irrespective of each person’s particular conception of a ‘good life’ and personal ‘comprehensive’ priorities). So the unanimous choice of these principles of justice does quite a bit of work in the Rawlsian system, which includes the choice of institutions for the basic structure of the society, as well as the determination of a political conception of justice, which Rawls presumes will correspondingly influence individual behaviours in conformity with that shared conception. The choice of basic principles of justice is the first act in Rawls’s multi-staged unfolding of social justice. This first stage leads to the next, ‘constitutional’, stage in which actual institutions are selected in line with the chosen principle of justice, taking note of the conditions of each particular society. The working of these institutions, in turn, leads to further social decisions at later stages in the Rawlsian system, for example through appropriate legislation (in what Rawls calls ‘the legislative stage’). The imagined sequence moves forward step by step on firmly specified lines, with an elaborately characterized unfolding of completely just societal arrangements. The whole process of this unfolding is based on the emergence of what he describes as ‘two principles of justice’ in the first stage that influence everything else that happens in the Rawlsian sequence. I have to express considerable scepticism about Rawls’s highly specific claim about the unique choice, in the original position, of one particular set of principles for just institutions, needed for a fully just society. There are genuinely plural, and sometimes conflicting, general concerns that bear on our understanding of justice. They need not differ in the convenient way– convenient for choice that is- that only one such set of principles really incorporates impartiality and fairness, while the others do not. Many of them share features of being unbiased and dispassionate, and represent maxims that their proponents can ‘will to be a universal law’ (to use Immanuel Kant’s famous requirement). Indeed, plurality of unbiased principles can, I would argue, reflect the fact that impartiality can take many different forms and have quite distinct manifestations. For example, in the illustration with the competing claims of three children over a flute, considered in the Introduction, underlying each child’s claim there is a general theory of how to treat people in an unbiased and impartial way, focusing, respectively, on effective use and utility, economic equity and distributional fairness, and the entitlement to the fruits of one’s unaided efforts. Their arguments are perfectly general, and their respective reasoning about the nature of a just society reflects different basic ideas that can each be defended impartially (rather than being parasitic on vested interests). And if there is no unique emergence of a given set of principles of justice that together identify the institutions needed for the basic structure of the society, then the entire procedure of ‘justice as fairness’, as developed in Rawls’s classic theory, would be hard to use. As was discussed in the Introduction, Rawls’s basic claim of the emergence of a unique set of principles of justice in the original position (discussed and defended in his A Theory of Justice) is considerably softened and qualified in his later writings. Indeed, in his Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Rawls notes that ‘there are

indefinitely many considerations that may be appealed to in the original position and each alternative conception of justice is favoured by some consideration and disfavoured by others’, and also that ‘the balance of reasons itself rests on judgment, though judgment informed and guided by reasoning’. When Rawls goes on to concede that ‘the ideal cannot be fully attained’, his reference is to his ideal theory of justice as fairness. However, there need not be anything particularly ‘non-ideal’ in a theory of justice that makes room for surviving disagreement and dissent on some issues, while focusing on many solid conclusions that would forcefully emerge from reasoned agreement on the demands of justice. What is clear, however, is that if Rawls’s second thoughts are really saying what they seem to be saying, then his earlier stage-by-stage theory of justice as fairness would have to be abandoned. If institutions have to be set up on the basis of a unique set of principles of justice emanating from the exercise of fairness, through the original position, then the absence of such a unique emergence cannot but hit at the very root of the theory. There is a real tension here within Rawls’s own reasoning over the years. He does not abandon, at least explicitly, his theory of justice as fairness, and yet he seems to accept that there are incurable problems in getting a unanimous agreement on one set of principles of justice in the original position, which cannot but have devastating implications for his theory of 'justice as fairness’. My own inclination is to think that Rawls’s original theory played a huge part in making us understand various aspects of the idea of justice, and even if that theory has to be abandoned– for which there is, I would argue, a strong case- a great deal of the enlightenment from Rawls’s pioneering contribution would remain and continue to enrich political philosophy. It is possible to be at once deeply appreciated and seriously critical of a theory, and nothing would make me happier than having Rawls’s own company, if that were to come, in this ‘dual’ assessment of the theory of justice as fairness.

1. According to Rawls,
(1) Principles of justice are the unanimous choice of a just society
(2) Principles of justice are politically derived
(3) Both the above
(4) None of the above

2. Which of the following best fits the title of the passage?
(1) The Idea of Justice
(2) Unbiased Principles
(3) Justice as Fairness
(4) The Basic Structure of Society

3. Which of the following is NOT a correct statement?
(1) Suitable principles need to be identified to determine the choice of just institutions
(2) Just institutions are required for the basic structure of society
(3) Rawls has identified specific principles of justice
(4) The author of the passage is in agreement with the principles of justice identified by Rawls

4. Which of the following is a correct statement?
(1) Rawls argues that citizens of a society governed by principles of justice would affirm a sense of justice based on them
(2) The author of the passage argues that citizens of a society governed by principles of justice would affirm a sense of justice based on them
(3) Both Rawls and the author of the passage argue that citizens of a society governed by principles of justice would affirm a sense of justice based on them
(4) Neither Rawls nor the author of the passage argues that citizens of a society governed by principles of justice would affirm a sense of justice based on them

5. Which of the following is a correct statement?
(1) The author of the passage argues that principles of justice are chosen by all in the original position
(2) Rawls argues that principles of justice are chosen by all in the original position

(3) Both the author of the passage and Rawls argue that principles of justice are chosen by all in the original position
(4) Neither the author of the passage nor Rawls argue that principles of justice are chosen by all in the original position

6. Which of the following is NOT a correct statement?
(1) The author of the passage believes that principles of justice constitute the political concept of justice
(2) Rawls believes that principles of justice constitute the political concept of justice
(3) Both the author of the passage and Rawls believe that principles of justice constitute the political concept of justice
(4) Neither the author of the passage nor Rawls believe that principles of justice constitute the political concept of justice

7. Which of the following is a correct statement?
(1) Rawls rejects the theory of justice as fairness
(2) The author of the passage rejects the theory of justice as fairness
(3) Neither the author of the passage nor Rawls rejects the theory of justice as fairness
(4) All of the above

8. Which of the following is NOT a correct statement?
(1) The author of ‘Justice as Fairness: A Restatement’ is not the author of the passage
(2) Rawls is the author of ‘Justice as Fairness: A Restatement’
(3) Rawls has not changed or modified his original position on the principles of justice.
(4) None of the above

9. According to the passage,
(1) Rawls’s multistage theory of justice as fairness is not tenable
(2) Rawls’s multistage theory of justice as fairness is very sound
(3) The author of the passage reinforces Rawls’s multistage theory of justice as fairness.
(4) None of the above

10. According to the passage,
(1) The basic principles of justice is the first stage of a multistaged process of social justice developed by Rawls.
(2) The basic principles of justice is the first stage of a multistaged process of social justice developed by the author of the passage
(3) Rawls’s concept of social justice is confined to the basic principles of justice
(4) Rawls’s concept of social justice developed as a two-stage process

11. Which of the following is a correct statement?
(1) The author of the passage does not agree that impartiality can take many different forms
(2) Rawls thinks that impartiality can take many different forms
(3) The author of the passage believes that impartiality can take many different forms
(4) None of the above

12. According to the passage,
(1) The author of the passage is in agreement with Rawls’s claim that there exists one particular set of principles for just institutions
(2) The author of the passage is not in agreement with Rawls’s claim that there exists one particular set of principles for just institutions
(3) Neither of the above
(4) Both (1) and (2) above

13. According to the passage,
(1) Rawls believes that there are several concerns that may lead to an understanding of justice
(2) The author of the passage believes that there are several concerns that may lead to an understanding of justice
(3) The author of the passage believes that one set of principles lead to our understanding of justice

(4) Rawls believes that there are conflicting concerns that may lead to an understanding of justice

14. According to the passage,
(1) There is no theory of how to ensure justice in an unbiased and impartial way
(2) One cannot treat people with economic equity and distributional fairness
(3) There is a general theory of economic equity and distributional fairness
(4) None of the above

15. Which of the following is a correct statement?
(1) Rawls suggests the theory ‘justice as fairness’
(2) The author of the passage suggests the theory ‘justice as fairness’
(3) Both Rawls and the author of the passage suggest the theory ‘justice as fairness’
(4) None of the above